Studies and observations
Notes on the social and ethical implications of ubicomp
Adam Greenfield
- Adam Greenfield's book: EveryWare
- "groundbreaking" "elegant" "soulful" (Bruce Sterling)
- First ubicomp work suitable for general audience
- Who is he?
- User-experience background
- Razorfish in tokyo - lead architect for web design
- built a lot of websites
- Instructor at NYU ITP of user-experience
- Author of "Everyware"
- Everyware is about Ubicomp, Percom, Tangible Media,
- Everyware - an emergent, post-PC paradigm for computation to be found anywhere distributed networking and info processing resources are found
- information processing integrated into the objects and surfaces of everyday life
Everyware example
- Japanese octopus system: an RFID card for subway access that one is supposed to take out and tap again a reader.
- Japanese women leave it in handbag, swing handbag at subway turnstile
- "digital transaction choreography" single-gesture
- functional efficiency
- but a risk because we forget that this info collection thing is there
A curious inversion in which the visible becomes invisible
and the latent is brought to light
Fine. Where do we stand with this?
- prototypes last year are commercial products this year
- adoption is unproblematic in real world
- RFID-based octopus in hongkong 95% of 16-65 population used system
- Everyware can be engaged even in the absence of active, conscious decision (as opposed to PC, cellphone, etc)
- We are being monitored, studied, collected!
- Everyware encourages the belief that meaningful knowledge of the world can be derived from machine inference (Realty Mining)
- Adam Greenfield says: these are not reasonable/meaningful data collections, often completely false
Problem:
- Differential permissioning without effective recourse.
- i.e... who do you turn to if the door doesn't open, but it should
- what if I 'need a credit card to participate' but I don't want one?
- Presence of one technology may trigger functionality in another... or unpredicatable/undesired emergent behaviors
- Everyware obscures the locus of control.
- (if I lose connection to the internet, where is the problem?)
- principle 1: default to harmlessness
- everyware presents itself as neutral and universal
- risk and safety are construed differently from one culture to another
- Korea (free kids) .. Germany .. US .. Japan (restricted kids)
- principle 2: be self-disclosing
- provisions for immediate querying of ownership, use, caps
- proposed icons to alert users to Everyware
- "black box" warning
- gesture available
- self-describing space
- self-describing obj
- info being gathered
- principle 3: be conservative of face
- don't unnecessarily embarasses, humiliate, or shame users
- nothing is universal (cultural differences)
- principle 4: be conservative of time
- don't add undue complications in ordinary ops
- i.e., kettle on stove... don't ask if I need help boiling water
- principle 5: be deniable
- always be able opt out at anypoint with no penalty (other than loss of functionality rendered by ubisystem)
audience questions/comments
- eventually opting out is not really an option (cars, cell phones for teens)
- Is it really good to take away awesome functionality because of privacy?
- hope for open-ended paternalism