opensourcejason.info
pervasive 2007 keynote

Studies and observations

Notes on the social and ethical implications of ubicomp

Adam Greenfield

  • Adam Greenfield's book: EveryWare
    • "groundbreaking" "elegant" "soulful" (Bruce Sterling)
    • First ubicomp work suitable for general audience
  • Who is he?
    • User-experience background
    • Razorfish in tokyo - lead architect for web design
    • built a lot of websites
    • Instructor at NYU ITP of user-experience
    • Author of "Everyware"
  • Everyware is about Ubicomp, Percom, Tangible Media,
  • Everyware - an emergent, post-PC paradigm for computation to be found anywhere distributed networking and info processing resources are found
  • information processing integrated into the objects and surfaces of everyday life

Everyware example

  • Japanese octopus system: an RFID card for subway access that one is supposed to take out and tap again a reader.
  • Japanese women leave it in handbag, swing handbag at subway turnstile
    • "digital transaction choreography" single-gesture
    • functional efficiency
      • but a risk because we forget that this info collection thing is there

A curious inversion in which the visible becomes invisible

and the latent is brought to light

Fine. Where do we stand with this?

  • prototypes last year are commercial products this year
  • adoption is unproblematic in real world
  • RFID-based octopus in hongkong 95% of 16-65 population used system
  • Everyware can be engaged even in the absence of active, conscious decision (as opposed to PC, cellphone, etc)
    • We are being monitored, studied, collected!
  • Everyware encourages the belief that meaningful knowledge of the world can be derived from machine inference (Realty Mining)
    • Adam Greenfield says: these are not reasonable/meaningful data collections, often completely false

Problem:

  • Differential permissioning without effective recourse.
    • i.e... who do you turn to if the door doesn't open, but it should
    • what if I 'need a credit card to participate' but I don't want one?
  • Presence of one technology may trigger functionality in another... or unpredicatable/undesired emergent behaviors
  • Everyware obscures the locus of control.
    • (if I lose connection to the internet, where is the problem?)
  • principle 1: default to harmlessness
    • everyware presents itself as neutral and universal
    • risk and safety are construed differently from one culture to another
    • Korea (free kids) .. Germany .. US .. Japan (restricted kids)
  • principle 2: be self-disclosing
    • provisions for immediate querying of ownership, use, caps
    • proposed icons to alert users to Everyware
    • "black box" warning
    • gesture available
    • self-describing space
    • self-describing obj
    • info being gathered
  • principle 3: be conservative of face
    • don't unnecessarily embarasses, humiliate, or shame users
    • nothing is universal (cultural differences)
  • principle 4: be conservative of time
    • don't add undue complications in ordinary ops
    • i.e., kettle on stove... don't ask if I need help boiling water
  • principle 5: be deniable
    • always be able opt out at anypoint with no penalty (other than loss of functionality rendered by ubisystem)

audience questions/comments

  • eventually opting out is not really an option (cars, cell phones for teens)
  • Is it really good to take away awesome functionality because of privacy?
    • hope for open-ended paternalism